Who We Are...

We are delighted to present our first Media Video release. You will be introduced to the Directors at  Robinson Sewell Partners - Brad Sewell and ...

Read More

Free Consultation

Get a free consultation today

Ian Robinson        0448 697 674

Brad Sewell          0427 390 016

Michael Stout       0427 692 418 

Andrew Toole       0437 889 036

Deb Purvis           0409 438 115

David Robertson  0407 697 797

John Waterman   0437 792 700

We will provide an assessment of your business needs, and expectations of our service and agree to the scope of work required.

Request your consultation here.

The Raw Prawn

11 Aug 2016 9:58 AM -

And the winner is….

Last week we saw the RBA drop rates by 25 basis points.  Our initial sugar rush of excitement was soon abated by economic ketosis with the major banks only sparingly passing on the benefits to the borrowers.  Australia’s mortgage belt only received the following benefits;

NAB                       10 points

Suncorp                 10 points

WBC                      10 points (for Interest Only)

ANZ                       12 points

CBA                       13 points


Chalk and Cheese in the Playground

At the time of writing I am yet to see the commercial reference rates been adjusted.  But for entertainment’s sake, let’s digest this matrix against the outcry of “increased funding costs” yelled from the roof tops of Australia’s traditional banks.  Drawing from scholastic kindergarten mathematics, scrawled in chalk on the pavement, Australia’s banks procure around 30% of their funding from wholesale (domestic & offshore) funds.  According to APRA’s June 2016 statistics, there were $1,929,931,000,000 lent to borrowers (consumer and commercial) from the top 5 banks (listed above). 

I have then taken the liberty of delineating each bank’s loan book by the amount of interest rate savings they have with-held.  This figure equates to $2,651,000,000 per annum in total of additional revenue to the banks.  Nice score.

Now let’s fancifully reverse engineer the equation.  With all else remaining status quo, if it is the wholesale funding costs that is the issue, these costs would have had to go up by 333% to compensate for this remarkable interest tax on borrowers.  I am pretty sure it is not from this source. 

Regulatory changes?  Maybe so, but Basel iii is transitional with a gradual roll out commencing from 2015 to 2019.  The true brunt of these changes are yet to be felt.

Perhaps the costs are apportioned to structural inefficiencies within the banking system, and are just being absorbed by the pricing power of the banks?  Dare you whisper these words down the corridors of some of the world’s most profitable banks. 

Or is it just supercharging the profits of the banks to ensure the shareholders receive double digit returns year in year out?  Bonus season is back in town.


The Cherry or the Prawn

Now here is the cherry, since Nov 2010 the RBA has reduced rates by 325 basis points, but the average mortgage rate has only dropped by 250 basis points.  Do the math’s on that!

Who do you think got served the raw prawn?  The RBA in their attempt to stimulate the economy and reduce the exchange rate?  Australian borrowers seeking to reduce their interest costs?  Australian savers on seeking retirement income on their term deposits or the shareholders of the Australian banks?  Maybe more than one prawn got served in that dish.

I will leave these questions open for a healthy (and maybe heated) debate.

But as a borrower (Agribusiness, Commercial, or otherwise) and you seek some of that $2,651,000,000 back in your pocket, then contact Robinson Sewell Partners to find out how.

(for greater insight into why the RBA dropped rates, please refer to this link: RBA Rate Drop)