Who We Are...

We are delighted to present our first Media Video release. You will be introduced to the Directors at  Robinson Sewell Partners - Brad Sewell and ...

Read More

Free Consultation

Get a free consultation today

Ian Robinson    0448 697 674

Brad Sewell       0427 390 016

Michael Stout    0427 692 418 

Andrew Toole    0437 889 036

Deb Purvis         0409 438 115

We will provide an assessment of your business needs, and expectations of our service and agree to the scope of work required.

Request your consultation here.

Comments: 3

POW Middlemen

25 Mar 2015 2:22 PM - Article by Robinson Sewell Partners

The reputation of the middle man is not positive.  Their perception in the market is to buy low and sell high without improving the product.  Supply chain revolutionaries are always seeking to bypass the middleman to recapture this misplaced value, yet the value chain functionality holds fast.  Why is this?

An interview by Russ Roberts to Mike Munger in Oct 2008 draws upon the experiences noted in RA Redford’s “Economica”, 1945 Vol 12 pp 189-201: The Economic Organisation of a POW Camp.  This WWII POW camp was like many others, a micro human ecology operating in a purely confined environment whereby the inputs (food) were a fixed weekly quantum and noted as a scarce resource. 

The social anatomy of the camp was predictable, every inmate received the same unified parcel of food within their Red X pack every week. There was bully beef, carrots, some chocolate, cigarettes, toilet paper etc.   But everyone had different preferences.  Some were non-smokers, some were allergic to chocolate and some were vegetarian.  The utility received by each inmate was not a fixed standard but varied according to their individual preferences.

Now voluntary exchange can only happen if the utility of each stakeholder participating in the exchange increases.  But in certain environments it is impossible to ascertain everyone’s utility requirements due to communication inefficiencies.  Hence, the middleman.

Enter into the story, the Itinerant Padre.  The onsite Anglican Priest had access to all POW inmates.  He made it his mandate to ascertain everyone’s appetite for preference and facilitated exchange within the camp according to their demands.  By the end of the day, the Itinerant Padre had traded multiple products across multiple participants and out of the process managed to procure for himself 2.5 Red X packs.

Economists argue how can this be so?  How can the Priest extract items from the limited pool of commodities during exchange?  Was overall welfare increased?  Did he rip off the constituents?

The analysis on this POW camp demonstrates that trade or exchange is NOT a zero sum game.  A zero sum game means for every win there is a loss.  There was no leakage in the system, it was a closed trading environment with a fixed set of products.   Everyone traded voluntarily to increase their personal welfare which then generated surplus product for the Priest.  The priest took on risk in partaking the exercise, extracted value from his research and intellectual property and created liquidity in the market for product.  Carefully noting that there was no “value adding” to any of the physical product during the course of exchange.

The priest created an emerging infrastructure for trade and exchange founded on information.  All of us in business, whether employees at a bank, running a business, providing advisory services are all middlemen.  Either value adding the physical product or providing a service founded on knowledge, all of which increases the utility of a consumer when voluntarily traded.  The middleman is not a Bogie, but a necessary function of the specialised value chain that functions in our closed economy: planet Earth.

Comments: 3

Comments

Make a Comment

POW Economy

26 Mar 2015,10:45 AM - Terry Brennan
Is it possible to calculate approximately the price the Padre charged; or his commission on all the transactions. How many Red X Packs were traded in total?

POW Economy

26 Mar 2015,10:45 AM - Terry Brennan
Is it possible to calculate approximately the price the Padre charged; or his commission on all the transactions. How many Red X Packs were traded in total?

POW Economy

26 Mar 2015,12:52 PM - Richard Wright
I believe he did not charge a price but started by exchanging items from his own Red Cross care package. Fascinating example of markets emerging in unlikely circumstances, and a middleman helping make them more efficient to the benefit of the participants and himself.